Packaging Machines
Dust-extraction systems were attached to the packaging machines, the sugar screening equipment, and the mills for

powdered-sugar production, to remove sugar dust. The dust-extraction ducts were connected

to dry dust collectors. However, it was found that the maintenance of the dust-collection

system had been poor. In addition, some equipment was significantly undersized or

incorrectly installed. Some dust ducts were found to be partially, and in some locations,

completely filled with sugar dust.
The plant had hired an outside consultant to evaluate airflows, pressure drops, and

other operating parameters on both the dry and the wet dust-collection systems. The report

identified numerous design and maintenance deficiencies. Because the report was delivered

only a few days before the 2008 catastrophe, there had been no opportunity to review or act

on it.
In addition, during the investigation following the 2008 catastrophe, it was found that

sugar conveying and processing equipment were not adequately sealed to prevent spillage of

significant quantities of sugar onto the adjacent floors. Less than 2 months before the

catastrophe, an internal inspection by company supervisors and quality assurance personnel

learnt that many tonnes of spilled sugar had to be removed from the floors at intervals and

returned to the refinery for reprocessing. Packaging operators and other employees also

reported significant amounts of sugar dust escaping the packaging equipment into the

working areas.
The systems for conveying maize starch to be mixed with the granulated sugar, the

grinding mills, and the powdered-sugar vertical packing machine all generated significant

quantities of sugar dust and maize starch in the work area. Workers reported that airborne

sugar dust and spilled sugar in the powdered-sugar processing and packaging work areas were

a constant problem and that significant accumulations were often seen on equipment and on

the floor. One worker told that he used a squeegee to clear a path on the floor through

spilled powdered sugar to get to equipment he operated during his shift.
Packaging equipment unwinds materials from its roll, forms it into the shape of a

container, fills it with product, and seals the container. Printed material should, of

course, reflect the container’s length (the “cutoff”) and its width (the “web”). Web

and cutoff can be no more precise than as initially printed, but any subsequent web

handling can introduce additional variability to both. Slitting defines a roll’s edge that

must parallel to the machine direction of the printing process. Figure 6.1 suggests the

challenge. Three impressions on the right have a light-colored border and three on the left

have a darker border. Slitting between the third and fourth impressions (cut No. 3) is

likely to produce a wavy line with alternating strips of either color. They would appear on

the right edge of the third roll and left edge of the fourth roll. When print extends to

(and through) a slit edge as in Figure 6.1 (called a “bleeding edge”) its color must be

uniform for a width at least as great as the side-to-side tolerance of the slitting

operation.
Once the contract has been agreed, the processes of design and construction may

commence. These lead to the manufacturing site acceptance trials, which would include a

full validation of all the operational requirements of the machine. The final stage is

delivery, installation and commissioning, at which the performance of the machine is

assessed to ensure that the required operational performance has been achieved.
A rather unusual application of rigid PVC involves building apparatus from machined

parts, largely because the polymer is very easy to machine into complex and intricate

components. A company in Coventry had the idea of building a type of

transparent

film packaging machine using such PVC components to produce the wrapping action

needed. Their concept included incorporating water-cooling channels within the PVC parts to

control the process. They built a working prototype using a combination of light alloy

components, slab PVC and acetal bearings (Fig. 6.17), and relied on a toolmaker to machine

the various PVC parts and solvent welding the parts together to make the inner water-

cooling channels. However, when the wrapping machine was first switched on in 1998,

numerous leaks occurred from the PVC components and rendered the process inoperable.
The forming process on a horizontal packing machine requires conformance of printing to the

expected machine sequence. The issue is a recurring one for printed rolls of any material

for any handling process. To communicate expectations, the printing industry (not only

flexible packaging) uses standard designations for print orientation on a roll (Figure

6.2). Eight orientations are described. Numbers one through four refer to printing wound to

read from the outside of the roll; five through eight refer to printing wound inside of the

roll. The four numbers of each set refer to the orientation of the printing relative to the

leading edge of the unwinding roll, top, bottom, right, or left.
The plastic packaging company sued the toolmaker for their losses. I was asked to

examine various parts and report on the root cause of the problem. One particular part was

chosen for close scrutiny. It was a bar 640 mm long with a section of 39 by 20 mm and when

examined, proved to be slightly curved, being about 2 mm out of true. The bar had been

solvent welded to form the water channel which ran along its length and was drilled at

either end (inner diameter about 8.5 mm) to accept the water supply. Macroscopic inspection

showed that the joint between the two halves exhibited a small gap of about 0.6 mm (Fig.

6.18). The same picture shows cross-threading on the upper part of the screw thread, which

no doubt was caused by numerous attempts to discover the source of the leak or disconnect

the supply to stop the leakage. Since the water pressure was about 2.6 bar or 38 psi, the

inner source of the leak was established. External examination showed a similar problem,

with similar sized gaps in the joint (Fig. 6.19), and since the bar had leaked here in

service, a path between the two gaps was present. No doubt the many other leaks in the

system were caused in a similar way by poor joints.
After pressing, the garment should be free from wrinkle and creases, and have a good

shape. Apparel needs to be stored and packed for delivery to the potential customers.

Nowadays, there are manual or semi-automatic small packing machine available in the industry, but

careless or inappropriate storage and packaging will cause a deterioration in the

appearance of the final product.
The pressed apparel should be stored in a cool, dry place. The storage should have

sufficient room to accommodate the apparel without being too closely packed, which could

not only cause wrinkles in the apparel, but also block the air circulation (causing a

moisture build-up leading to mildew on the apparels), or result in excessive heat causing

the plastic bags to bond to the fabric. Also, the storage area should be as clean as

possible so that dust and dirt, the acid pressure in atmospheric pollution, as well as the

presence of moths or other pests, do not cause apparel to deteriorate during storage.

Apparel in storage should not be subjected to any strain or movement that could cause the

fibres to become weak and break. Avoid pressing in sharp folds. Different types of apparel

should have different conditions of storage and packaging. Knitted or stretched apparel

should preferably be folded rather than hung, and should be stored in a plastic bag. Nylon

hosiery should be stored and packed in plastic bags to prevent snagging. Sweaters should

also be stored in plastic bags to keep them from becoming contaminated by lint. Clothing

containing wool should be stored in a moth-free or mothproofed place (Finch and Putnam,

1977; Fan and Hunter, 2009).
Various kinds of machinery are employed in food and pharmaceutical processing. A plant

may have a variety of tanks, fermenters or bioreactors, pumps, valves, centrifuges,

homogenizers, heat exchangers, evaporators, spray dryers, and packaging machines, as well

as other devices. A vessel may have internals, such as agitators, ports for sensors, shafts

and mechanical seals, mechanical foam breakers, baffles, and gas spargers, all of which

have an impact on cleanability. Irrespective of the type of equipment, all plant components

for food and pharmaceutical processing should be CIP capable. Equipment design should

ensure that all surfaces that in any way contact the product, including vapor, foam, and

sprayed or splashed material, receive cleaning solutions during CIP. For example, a

submerged culture fermenter may need to be supplied with CIP solutions at multiple points

to ensure proper cleaning. In addition to being sprayed in the vessel, the CIP solutions

may have to be sequenced through the submerged aeration pipe, the air exhaust lines that

may be contaminated with fine culture droplets and foam, the mechanical foam breaker, and

the various supply lines for the medium, inoculum, antifoam agents, and pH control

chemicals, as well as any harvest lines. Cleaning of the sample valve and any retractable

probes will require attention. Similar specifics need to be evaluated during the design of

other process items and in planning a CIP scheme.